Health Care Systems Committee, American Geriatrics Society
The American Geriatrics Society (AGS) believes that Assisted Living Facilities (ALF) can offer seniors an environment that could enhance their health status over other possible living arrangements. This Position Statement is to provide policymakers, administrators, health care professionals, and consumers with guidance for achieving optimum outcomes with regards to ALFs.
The following principles are essential to realizing the potential benefits of ALFs.
Rationale: Consumers of ALFs need to have detailed information regarding the services provided and any associated costs. In contrast to nursing facilities whose primary payor are the states through Medicaid, ALF payors tend to be the residents themselves. As a result, ALFs are subject to less state and federal regulation and are more affected by market pressures. In order for consumers to make optimal decisions, ALFs need to disclose fully the services provided, the limitations of their facility, how much functional decline they can handle effectively, and especially the criteria residents must continue to meet to remain in the ALF. In addition, the staffing levels and expertise should be discussed with all potential ALF residents.
Reference: Hawes C, Phillips C, Rose M. (2000) High Service or High Privacy Assisted Living Facilities, their Residents and Staff: Results from a National Survey. Miriam Rose, Myers Research Institute. U.S Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, Office of Disability, Aging, and Long-Term Care Policy (ASPE) and Research Triangle Institute, November.
Rationale: A resident’s move to assisted living is a critical life-change event. This event offers a special opportunity for a comprehensive review of the resident’s health and social needs. This move to an ALF often signals some medical, cognitive or functional need for the senior, which makes a comprehensive assessment all the more crucial at this transition of care. It also offers the opportunity to provide optimum interventions designed to maintain independence and prevent pre-existing conditions from deteriorating.
Rationale: Staffing levels and expertise do vary between ALFs. In a national study of ALFs, 40% reported having full-time registered nurse staff, 55% had a registered nurse either full or part time, and 71% had a registered nurse or licensed practical nurse on staff full or part time. About half (52%) used outside agencies to supply registered or licensed practical nurses. Staff working on-site should be sufficient in numbers and experience to meet the ongoing needs of the residents at all times. Staff should be knowledgeable regarding safe medication administration, falls prevention, incontinence care, communication techniques, dementia care, skin care, and recognition of the changes that can signal acute illness/delirium.
Reference: Phillips, Munoz, Sherman et al. (2003) Effects of Facility Characteristics
on Departures from Assisted Living: Results from a National Study. Gerontologist 42 (5): 690–696.
Reference: Ambulatory Geriatric Clinical Care and Services Position Statement. Developed by the AGS Health Care Systems Committee and approved May 2000 by the AGS Board of Directors. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 48:845-846. 2000.
Rationale: The benefit of clinical leadership within long-term-care facilities was noted in 1978 in the Journal of the American Geriatrics Society and later supported by a 1993 AGS position statement on the Physician’s Role in the Long-Term Care Facility, which illustrated the importance of this involvement. This benefit is true in all long-term-care facilities, including ALFs, extended-care units, skilled nursing facilities, intermediate care facilities, and residential units caring for frail residents. More recently the work of the Assisted Living Workgroup highlighted the link between these clinical services and outcome for ALF residents.
Reference: Ingman SR, Lawson IR, Carbon D. (1978) Medical Direction in Long-term Care. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 26(4);157–166.
Reference: Assisted Living Workgroup Report to US Senate Special Committee on Aging 2003. Available at: www.aahsa.org/alw.htm (accessed November 2005).
Rationale: A comprehensive system of care is able to accommodate seniors with varied needs as they traverse through different levels of health and function in their aging lifetime. Key to coordination of care is communication at each transition of care.
Reference: Improving the Quality of Transitional Care for Persons with Complex Care Needs Position Statement. Developed by the AGS Health Care Systems Committee and approved May 2002 by the AGS Board of Directors. The American Geriatrics Society, New York, NY.
Rationale: The lack of noninstitutional, long-term-care services in many rural areas may explain why residents of nursing homes in rural areas tend to be younger and less disabled than their urban counterparts. Part of this can be accomplished with continued funding of the 1915[c] Home and Community Based Services waiver program to provide needed services. The 1915[c] Home and Community Based Services waiver is the primary Medicaid funding vehicle for low-income persons requiring assisted living services.
Reference: Spector W, et al. (1996) Appropriate placement of nursing home residents in lower levels of care. Millbank Quarterly. 74:139–160.
American Geriatrics Society and approved by the AGS Board of Directors in May 2004. Written by the AGS Health Care Systems Committee, with special thanks to Drs. Richard Stefanacci, Leslie Wooldridge, and Kenneth Brummel-Smith. AGS, The Empire State Building, 350 Fifth Avenue, Suite 801, New York, NY 10118.
SOURCE: American Geriatrics Society. Assisted Living Facilities: American Geriatrics Society Position Paper, AGS Health Care Systems Committee. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(3):536–537. Reprinted by permission of Blackwell Science, Inc.